News from SAU World

How to best manage chips – causes, and solutions

Written by SAU Team | Feb 11, 2026 12:00:00 PM

This guide was born from the desire to be able to solve the biggest problems in turning processes, going against the operators in the sector who find themselves taken aback by some unpleasant inconveniences.

Keep reading.

Chip Management - Cause/Solution

Long chip control

Long tangled chips that wrap around the tool or workpiece. Generally due to low feed values and low and/or shallow cutting depths.

 

Cause

  • Progress too low for the chosen geometry

Solution

  • Increase progress
  • Choose an insert geometry with better chip control characteristics
  • Use a tool with precision coolant

Cause

  • Cutting depth too low for the chosen geometry

Solution

  • Increase cutting depth, or choose a geometry with better chip control characteristics

Cause

  • Nose radius is too large

Solution

  • Select a smaller nose radius

Cause

  • Recording angle not suitable

Solution

  • Choose an attachment with the widest possible recording angle (angle of attachment).
    KAPR = 90° (PSIR = 0°)

 

Short chip control

Very short chips, often glued together, due to difficult chip breakage.
Difficult chip breakage often reduces tool life or results in insert breakage, due to the high chip load on the cutting edge.

Cause

  • Progress too high for the chosen geometry

Solution

  • Choose a geometry designed for higher feeds, preferably a single-sided insert
  • Reduce progress

Cause

  • Recording angle not suitable

Solution

  • Choose an attachment with the smallest possible recording angle (angle of attachment).
    KAPR = 45°–75° (PSIR 45–15°)

Cause

  • Nose radius is too small

Solution

  • Select a bigger nose radius

 

Surface finish

The surface has an irregular appearance, both to the touch and to the eye, and does not conform to the specified tolerances.

Cause

  • The chips break against the component leaving marks on the finished surface

Solution

  • Select a geometry which guides the chips away from the component
  • Change entering angle
  • Reduce depth of cut
  • Select a positive tool system with a neutral angle of inclination

Cause

  • Irregular surface caused by excessive notch wear of the cutting edge

Solution

  • Select a grade with better resistance to oxidation wear, for example Cermet
  • Reduce the cutting speed

Cause

  • Feed is too high, in combination with a nose radius that is too small, a rough surface is generated

Solution

  • Select a wiper insert or a larger nose radius
  • Reduce feed

 

Burr formation

Burr formation on the workpiece when entering or exit of the workpiece.

Cause

  • The cutting edge is not sharp enough
  • The feed is too low for the edge roundness

Solution

  • Use insert with sharp edges, PVD coated inserts or ground inserts at small feed rates, < 0.1 mm/rev

Cause

  • Notch wear at depth of cut, or chipping

Solution

  • Use a holder with a small entering angle

Cause

  • Burr formation at the end or start of cut

Solution

  • End or start the cut with a chamfer or a radius when exiting/entering the workpiece

 

Vibrations

High radial cutting forces due to vibrations or marks produced by vibrations caused by tools or tool assembly. Typical problems of in-house machining with boring bars.

Cause

  • Unsuitable entering angle

Solution

  • Select a larger entering angle (lead angle). KAPR = 90° (PSIR = 0°)

Cause

  • Nose radius is too large

Solution

  • Select a smaller nose radius

Cause

  • Unsuitable edge rounding, or negative chamfer

Solution

  • Select a grade with a thin coating, or an uncoated grade

Cause

  • Excessive flank wear on the cutting edge

Solution

  • Select a more wear resistant grade or reduce speed

 

Vibration

High tangential cutting forces.

Cause

  • Insert geometry creating high cutting forces
  • Chip breaking is too hard, producing high cutting forces

Solution

  • Select a positive insert geometry
  • Reduce the feed or select a geometry for higher feeds

Cause

  • Cutting forces vary or are too low due to small depth of cut

Solution

  • Increase the depth of cut to make the insert cut

Cause

  • Tool is incorrectly positioned

Solution

  • Check the centre height

Cause

  • Instability in the tool due to long overhang

Solution

  • Reduce the overhang
  • Use the largest possible bar diameter
  • Use Anti-vibration tool or a carbide bar

Cause

  • Unstable clamping leads to insufficient rigidity

Solution

  • Extend the clamping length of the boring bar

 

Insert wear

To work with optimized cutting data, obtain the best possible quality components and safeguard tool life, always check the insert/cutter after machining. For successful turning, refer to this list of causes and solutions of various forms of insert wear.

 

Flank wear

Preferable wear type in every application. Offers predictable and stable tool life.

Cause

  • Cutting speed too high
  • Too tough grade
  • Insufficient wear resistance
  • Hard inclusions in workpiece material

Solution

  • Reduce cutting speed
  • Select a more adequate quality in terms of toughness or wear resistance

Notch wear

Cause

  • Sticky and/or work-hardening materials
  • Use a ~90° entering angle
    (~0° lead angle)
  • Geometry is too negative

Solution

  • Select a sharper edge
  • Decrease entering angle
  • Vary depth of cut

Crater wear


Cause

  • Too high cutting speed and/or feed
  • Chip breaker too narrow
  • Chemical dissolution or abrasive wear
  • Wear resistance too low

Solution

  • Reduce cutting speed or feed
  • Select a more wear resistant grade
  • Select a more open/positive geometry

Plastic deformation

Depression Impression

Cause

  • High heat load and pressure, cutting temperature too high
  • Grade too tough/soft
  • Lack of coolant supply

Solution

  • Reduce heat and pressure load by reducing cutting speed and/or feed
  • If edge depression, reduce feed first
  • If flank depression, reduce speed first
  • Select a more wear/heat resistant grade
  • Select a more open/positive geometry
  • Improve coolant supply

Built-up edge (B.U.E)

Cause

  • Too low cutting temperature
  • Sticky/smeary material
  • Geometry too negative
  • Coating too thick

Solution

  • Increase cutting temperature by increasing speed
  • Select a PVD-coated grade (less T. D. R. on PVD-coatings)
  • Select a more positive geometry

Flaking

Cause

  • Smeary material
  • Cutting speed too low
  • Intermittent machining with coolant
  • Coating too thick

Solution

  • Increase cutting speed
  • Turn off coolant
  • Select a grade with thinner coating and better edge line security (PVD)

Chipping on edge

Cause

  • Unstable conditions
  • Grade too hard/brittle
  • Coating too thick (CVD, leading to edge line flaking)

Solution

  • Make the machine conditions more stable
  • Select a tougher grade
  • Select a stronger geometry
  • Select grade with thinner coating (PVD)

Thermal cracks

Cause

  • Varying cutting edge temperatures
  • Intermittent cuts and coolant
  • Grade is sensitive to heat shock variations
  • Use of grade with thicker coating (CVD)

Solution

  • Switch off coolant or apply coolant copiously to obtain an even temperature level
  • Decrease cutting speed
  • Select grade with thinner coating (PVD)

Breakage

Cause

  • Excessive wear
  • Wrong choice of grade (too tough/hard)
  • Wrong cutting data

Solution

  • Run shorter (time in cut) operations: check how wear begins and the dominant wear type
  • Change cutting data
  • Select a more suitable insert grade/geometry

Slice fracture - ceramics

Cause

  • Excessive tool pressure

Solution

  • Reduce feed
  • Select a tougher grade
  • Select an insert with a smaller chamfer, or use another geometry to change cutting force direction

Chipping outside the cutting zone

Cause

  • Chip jamming because of facing towards shoulder
  • The chips are deflected against the cutting edge
  • Not optimized feed or feed direction

Solution

  • Change operation path (to avoid facing towards shoulder)
  • Change feed
  • Select a PVD-coated grade
  • Select an insert geometry that alters the chip flow

 

Conclusions

Sau with its forty years of experience can solve your problems and provide you with considerable technical support. Thanks to all this and the advanced technologies that enable its continuous growth and the possibility of offering solutions tailored to every need, it makes SAU the ideal partner for those who want to achieve excellent results in every situation.

To learn more about how to best manage your chip and how Sau can improve your manufacturing processes, contact us today.

Sau Team

SAU - Quality Tools Engineering since 1982.